This post by Valentin Lang, Policy Analyst at the OECD provides a first look on Andy Sumner’s piece for the OECD’s Development Cooperation Report 2013. This blog is part of the Wikiprogress series on post-2015.
A critical time for the future of global development has
begun. In September, the international community gathered at the United Nations General
Assembly in New York to launch the final phase of the international process
that will lead to a new global development framework for post2015. The
development community has started vigorous work on new approaches to end
poverty. A much awaited publication in this regard is the OECD’s Development Cooperation Report 2013: Ending Poverty, the subject of a live panel debate
in London on 5 December 2013.
In his contribution
to the report,
Andy
Sumner, Co-Director of King’s
International Development Institute, shows that the global patterns of
poverty have changed fundamentally over the past few years. He argues that we
won’t be successful in tackling this new pattern of poverty with our current
approach to international development. The world economy has changed and so has
poverty. The next development framework has to account for this and has to
initiate new forms of development cooperation. According to Sumner, a “new bottom billion” lives in
middle-income countries. Whereas in 1990, most extremely poor persons lived in
a low-income country, today more than 70% of them live in middle-income
countries. In the next few years, some of these countries could even develop
into high-income countries if they meet IMF growth forecasts.
In short, we see the geography of poverty shifting radically
This new world of poverty consists primarily of countries
whose gross national income per capita gives
them middle income status but whose “nothing magically happens when a country crosses an arbitrary line into a new classification based on per capita income” population comprises large numbers of
extremely poor. Apparently, mere economic growth does not guarantee progress in
poverty reduction. Today, the poverty problem is inextricably linked to the
inequality problem.
Sumner draws some important conclusions from these
remarkable findings. He argues that if we want to eradicate poverty in the
future, the traditional approach of “development aid” that flows from OECD
countries to the least developed countries is by far not enough. Development
cooperation has to realise that. Development
cooperation with countries whose populations suffer from poverty should
therefore not be less intense only because of their middle-income status – but
it should be different:
Development cooperation with middle-income countries can
draw on a wider range of resources and policy options than low-income countries.
Middle-income countries have a larger tax base and have more domestic resources
available for work in poverty reduction. The credit ratings of middle-income
countries allow them to borrow capital from financial markets. Therefore,
development cooperation can and must take new forms beyond ODA.
For instance, Sumner points to the possibility that
providers of development cooperation could shift from grants to concessional
loans and to the co-financing of global and regional initiatives. Knowledge
sharing and joint policy-related research will also have to become more
important. Another central challenge for providers of development cooperation
is to focus more on policy coherence for development. They must better
co-ordinate development and non-development policies and ensure that the latter
do not undermine the former.
At the same time, a focus on inequality has to be a key
feature of future development cooperation. Combating global poverty means
combating inequality inside countries. Mere economic growth will not suffice.
It must be inclusive and must be connected to socio-economic policies that tackle
inequalities: “Growth with redistribution is the way forward.” Sumner’s
analysis, thus, points to the fact that it seems inevitable to address
inequalities in the post-2015 development framework.
The new geography of poverty requires new policies to fight
it and Andy Sumner’s contribution to the OECD’s Development Cooperation Report
2013 leads the way ahead.
Why do users have to pay to download this OECD report? Its research and production has been funded by taxpayer contributions from member countries, yet we are being asked to pay on top of that to access material that has been funded by our money.
ReplyDeleteOur members ask that we make OECD's work as widely accessible as possible and they also ask us to recoup the costs of publishing (not costs of the research). This is why we have developed a 'freemium' access model whereby all publications are free to read online but we charge those who wish to download for offline reading. You can find the report here http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/development-co-operation-report_20747721 and clicking the little orange icon will lead you to the free version. The free version is optimised for all devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, smartphones) and is shareable via social media channels and embeddable.
ReplyDeleteToby Green, Head of Publishing, OECD