Image taken from HBSC International Study 2011 |
Last week, Wikichild launched its first
online discussion at Health Behavior in School-Aged Children’s 30thAnniversary event in St. Andrews, Scotland. The event, which spread over three
days, featured a diverse range of speakers including participants from UNICEF,
the OECD and Johns Hopkins University, who each in turn offered their insight
into the field of child well-being.
The Wikichild presentation and following
discussion were a great success with members of the audience showing enthusiasm
for the online consultation platform. At Wikichild, Wikiprogress and
Wikigender, it is our hope that these online discussions will allow researchers
and policy makers to interact with members of the public and thus garner a more
comprehensive perspective on important topics such as child well-being.
An interesting point that was raised during
our presentation was that the online discussion references children without
specifying what we mean by the word. Do we mean someone younger than 18 years or young people between 10 and 19 years? The consultation is intended to
encapsulate opinions on the well-being of very young children and adolescents,
however, the audience member who raised the issue, stipulated that the
well-being of each group must be measured separately, both now, and in the
future.
According to a recent Lancet paper on
adolescent health, the health of young people between the age of 10-24 has
improved far less than that of younger children over the past 50 years. This is
due in part to the inadequate identification by researches and policy makers of
adolescents as an individual group. It seems that the term young person not
only has a number of different meanings but a range of definitions, which often
overlap: a ‘child’ is defined by the Convention on the Rights of the Child as a
person younger than 18 years, ‘adolescence’ is categorized by the World Health 0rganization as the
period between 10 and 19 years, the UN defines ‘youth’ as people aged between
15 and 24 years and so on (‘Adolescence: a foundation for future health’ – The Lancet). As a result, governing bodies
have struggled to focus investments to address the needs of
adolescents.
‘Building a worldwide agenda for adolescent health needs an escalation in the visibility of young people and an understanding of challenges to their health and development.’ Seizing the opportunities of adolescent health – The Lancet
While child well-being in itself is a
fairly new topic of study, adolescent health is a much younger discipline by
comparison. Decades of clinical experience and research has generated
noticeable improvements in the growth and the integration of child public
health, and members of the Lancet team argue that the same process must be
applied to the field of adolescent well-being.
The present generation of young people is
the largest in history – with a population of 1.8 million, the majority of
which live in low-income countries. In Africa for example, Young people aged between 15
and 25 represent more than 60 per cent of the continent’s total population and
account for 45 per cent of the total labour force. Adolescents
face notably different challenges from previous generations including rising
poverty, inadequate education and mass unemployment and as a result there are
increasing calls by experts for adolescent well-being to be high on the agenda
for future development frameworks such as Post-2015.
To have your say on what you believe are the most important domains of well-being for young people, and
how these areas should be measured, leave a comment on our discussion page. The conversation has already had some excellent input and we
want to hear your opinion. Make your voice heard!
Robbie Lawrence
Wikichild Coordinator
No comments:
Post a Comment